Tom Brokaw – Seattle: Leaving some important topics on the cutting room floor
Last night I stood in line for 45 minutes of uncharacteristically cold Seattle weather to hear Tom Brokaw speak at Town Hall.
In short:
- He was a straight talker with a sharp point of view, I enjoyed hearing him speak; I bought his latest book, “Boom.”
- The conversation with the lecturer was like watching a rather unchallenging series of softball throws, each question easier than the next. It showed that the interviewer felt he didn’t have much to add to prior interviews or even a strong opinion about the book. Brokaw was gracious and gave solid answers.
- Seattle never fails to disappoint, giving floor time to unscreened questions on conspiracy theories.
Brokaw must have left confirmed in his opinion of the Radical West. One thing bothered me though: my own lack of gumption in getting up to ask a question I felt strongly about–how the 50s and 60s laid the groundwork for an unspoken epidemic of white collar layoffs the Boomers are now suffering through.
The Boomers grew up being catered to in marketing, dreamt big, lived through a war, questioned hard and took the opportunity to break the rules in the 60s, made it through a tough recession in the 70s, some would argue that many went from hippies to yuppies and reaped the benefits of the 80s. As a demographic, they are hard pressed to make it unscathed through the massive economic restructurings of the 90’s and early decades of 2000.
How then, can a book focused on “what happened in the 60s” not lay the groundwork for what is happening now in our workforce? According to a March 1996 series of articles in the New York Times, “The Downsizing of America,” 43 Million jobs have been lost since 1979 affecting nearly one-third of all households.
I patiently waited my turn for him to sign my copy while the person ahead of me wasted our collective time berating Brokaw for “not personalizing.” Brokaw briefly commented: “Layoffs, it’s a big topic, we’re going through that at NBC.” Gone was my opportunity for a more thoughtful response from someone with such a meaningful vantage point. Never again will I miss my chance on the platform.
Downsizing in America makes the case that….(excerpt from Amazon book review)
“the media tends to favor the dramatic figures from large, well-known manufacturers. Manufacturing in America has been in long-term decline since 1967 and manufacturers have steadily shed jobs. However, agriculture and manufacturing only provide employment for 15% of the population, so this segment is not a good proxy for the entire economy.”
“Downsizing”, it turns out, is corporate-speak for upsizing. Firms laid off one set of workers – disproportionately less-educated, older, female or parents of young children – and hired on another set, by implication younger, male and single. Was the resulting workforce more productive? No, there was no change in employee productivity. Moreover, non-managerial employees bore the brunt of the layoffs, so that claims to be ridding the company of “fat” actually increased the management-to-staff ratio.
Did investors reward companies for their action? Perception says that downsizing is followed by an increase in the stock price. The reality is that stock prices remain steady or decline after downsizing announcements.
So what were the benefits of downsizing? The authors come to a surprising, but authoritative conclusion. Downsizing announcements force down staff wages so that the firm retains more profit. Simple really, isn’t it?
The Wall Street Journal had a series of stories on the then epidemic of white collar layoffs, starting with the Kodak layoffs in the early 90s. They committed early on to print a story a week until someone stood up to do something, but after about 3 months, you just didn’t read about it anymore. It became the norm. The Dot Com Bubble made an art of such bolemic practices, bringing people in and letting them go, looking at this sort of hefty decision making as a growth opportunity for its management.
Other links on Brokaw:
- Interview with KUOW
- Interview with TVGuide
News articles on the downsizing of America:
- The Downsizing of America
- The Downsizing and Demoralizing of the American Workforce
- Benchmarking Study Report
Seamus Heaney…
Every now and then, I’m reminded about how similar we all are. How many of the same emotions, situations and daily activities have been noticed for the first time by someone, repeated by millions of us over time, and still resonate as “quaint” or personal.
I have a love affair with lectures…below are my notes and some background on a favorite poem translated by SH.
Background
—————–
From a lecture by Seamus Heaney There is a fragmentary ninth century manuscript belonging to the monastery of St. Paul, Unterdrauberg (in southern Austria). Preserved in that manuscript, along with a Virgil commentary and some Greek paradigms, are Irish language poems – including the little poem about the scholar and his cat, Pangur Ban – perhaps noted down by a bored monkish copyist. That poem had no readership, and no influence, for one thousand years – until it was published by Stokes and Strachan in 1902.
It is now the most famous poem in the Irish language, and one of the best known and the best loved poems in the world – the various translations have been much anthologised, and practically every Irish poet has made her or his version. The Robin Flower translation was chosen by Seamus Heaney and Ted Hughes for their successful children’s anthology The Rattle Bag. A new translation, by Sean Hutton, Chair of the British Association for Irish Studies, will be found in Shaun Traynor, The Poolbeg Book of Irish Poetry for Children. In fact, in these days of the Internet, a simple way of discovering Irish language enthusiasts throughout the world is to start a Web search for ‘Pangur Ban’.Pangur Ban
I and Pangur Ban my cat,
‘Tis a like task we are at:
Hunting mice is his delight,
Hunting words I sit all night.
Better far than praise of men
‘Tis to sit with book and pen;
Pangur bears me no ill-will,
He too plies his simple skill.
‘Tis a merry task to see
At our tasks how glad are we,
When at home we sit and find
Entertainment to our mind.
Oftentimes a mouse will stray
In the hero Pangur’s way;
Oftentimes my keen thought set
Takes a meaning in its net.
‘Gainst the wall he sets his eye
Full and fierce and sharp and sly;
‘Gainst the wall of knowledge I
All my little wisdom try.
When a mouse darts from its den,
O how glad is Pangur then!
O what gladness do I prove
When I solve the doubts I love!
So in peace our task we ply,
Pangur Ban, my cat, and I;
In our arts we find our bliss,
I have mine and he has his.
Practice every day has made
Pangur perfect in his trade;
I get wisdom day and night
Turning darkness into light.
– Anon., (Irish, 8th century)
